Facebook recently told me that I needed to convert my personal account into a “content creator” account. Why? I have no idea.
As a minor show of rebellion, I changed my work title on there to “discontent creator.” Because I refuse to define my work as “content.”
I hate that word.
To the current culture, a novel is content. A film or documentary is content. A poem is content. A painting is content. A thoughtful essay is content. A comedy sketch is content. A cat falling off a table is content as long as a camera is running.
The word treats all of those things as interchangeable cogs in a system whose purpose is to capture attention long enough for someone to show ads. I don’t object to someone making money, but I do object to a soulless system which offers no real value for the attention it steals.
I don’t want to create content.
I want to write.
I want to make films.
I want to create images.
I want to communicate ideas and feelings.
I want to create connections with others.
Those distinctions matter.
Some people vaguely object to social media “content” because it’s poor quality slop, but that’s far too simplistic.

I’ll make fun of your Super Bowl, but you can’t make fun of my Spock ears
Cop pepper-spraying protesters is symbol for arrogant police culture
You’re not going to understand me as I want to be understood

Silly controversy over Cadillac ad reminds us we want different things
Social media creates shallow ties at expense of deeper connections
Bachmann’s attack on Obama’s TelePrompTer was cynical hypocrisy