When I answered my phone, the young man told me his name, but not much else. I was still trying to figure out why he had called when he suddenly blurted out his disagreement with me.
“What you said doesn’t prove God!” he said with certainty.
I suddenly realized this man had gone to the trouble of finding my phone number and calling just to tell me how wrong I had been about something I’d written.
I rarely write overtly about religion or theology, but I’ve said a lot recently that’s required me to refer to elements of my faith more than usual. Something I’d written had annoyed this man.
At first, I thought he was an angry atheist calling to challenge my non-rational belief in my creator. I still wasn’t clear about what I had written to annoy him, but I explained that he seemed to misunderstand my intent.
“If you think I’m trying to prove anything, you’ve mistaken me for something I’m not,” I told him. “I’m just reporting what I’ve experienced. What you believe is up to you.”
That’s when he surprised me.
It turned out he was an angry theist, not an angry atheist. He was annoyed with me because I hadn’t cited the apologetic argument and the “proof text” that he had been taught.
He told me I shouldn’t talk about my own subjective spiritual experience. He felt certain that it was a waste of time to talk about love and silence and “fuzzy emotions” about hate and forgiveness.
I responded as gently as I could.
“Have you ever actually read the Sermon on the Mount?” I asked.

We learn how to make a living, but not how to make a good life
FRIDAY FUNNIES
FRIDAY FUNNIES
Ron Paul isn’t a racist, but the old newsletters need a credible response
Nobody can ever be good enough when perfection is the standard
GAME: Can you find names of the last 20 commenters on this site?
Lesson of ‘judgment day’ error? Certainty doesn’t indicate truth
How do you suppose invention of ‘truth machine’ would affect you?
Not satire this time: In New Zealand, one model cries discrimination