I used to be certain.
Not just confident or comfortable, but certain in the way only a young person can be when handed a complete system and told it explains everything. I had been taught a theology that divided the world neatly into what was true and what was false. It came with answers for every question that mattered and, more importantly, it came with the assumption that those answers were final.
I didn’t question it. Why would I? It was what I had been given. It felt like truth because it felt like home.
When I listen to people argue about theology now, I often recognize something uncomfortably familiar. I hear the same tone of certainty I once had. I see people defending systems they didn’t build but have fully embraced. They assume their conclusions are objectively true and everything else is objectively wrong.
I understand that mindset because I once lived there.

Ayn Rand spins in her grave? ‘Atlas Shrugged’ is a bad film
Monkeys celebrating new donation button, hoping for more bananas
HUMOR: The senator chooses between heaven and hell
Dickens’ ‘David Copperfield’ far superior to postmodern novels
Change sometimes happens slowly, not in the grand leap that we want
When strangers tell us things we want to hear, we want to believe
Petty politics as usual just might be Chris Christie’s bridge to obscurity
Christmas tree ‘promotion fee’ is just another hidden tax on consumers