Brutal truth is that we will never be able to fix all of world’s evils

By David McElroy · July 16, 2015

There was a shooting in Chattanooga, Tenn., today. Four Marines were apparently killed by a gunman motivated by religious hatred. That’s as much as I know about it — and that’s all I want to know.

When I was growing up, I thought it was everyone’s duty to be informed. By that, I meant one should read newspapers and watch news on television. It somehow seemed like the responsible thing to do. I thought news was important. That’s probably part of the reason I ended up spending a decade in the newspaper business.

But I pay little attention to news today. What’s more, I pay very little attention to the larger evils that I’m aware of. I know people are being slaughtered in various countries because of political and religious conflicts. I know that people are sitting in prisons — in the United States and around the world — who have no business being punished for things that shouldn’t even be crimes. I know that there is open slavery in some parts of the world. I know there is underground sex trafficking in most places. I know that women are abused and children are being taught to continue ugly cycles of evil all around the world, including near me.

I know that children and adults suffer in violent and dysfunctional households. I know that kids are being beaten and sexually abused pretty much everywhere, mostly hidden. I know that animals are being tortured and abused for the pleasure of evil people. I know that people mistreat each other and hate one another and excuse it in the name of religion or other beliefs.

There’s so much evil that it’s impossible to list it all. In fact, there’s so much evil in the world that much of it is so routine as to seem banal.

I’m not paying attention to any more of it than I have to, but it’s not that I’m callous. I actually care too much.

I care too much to treat it as entertainment. I care too much to look at it all the time and then go right on living my life as though nothing happened. I can either ignore it or I can become overwhelmed and go crazy.

I have had to learn to ignore evil — to ignore what we call news — because I’m not willing to sacrifice my life and destroy myself for nothing. I finally had to accept this brutal truth — that you can’t change everything that’s evil in the world. I had to learn that until you accept that, you’re not going to have peace in your life.

The world is full of voices lecturing us about doing something about all the world’s ills. We’re rarely told how we can stop evil, of course. We’re just exhorted to do impossible things.

Albert Einstein is frequently quoted as having said or written, “The world will not be destroyed by those who do evil, but by those who watch them without doing anything.” Since so many supposed Einstein quotes are fakes, I don’t know if he said it or not, but the point is that this is the typical voice of wisdom in the world today.

And that “wisdom” is a path to misery in most cases.

People often express surprise that I read or watch almost no news anymore. When I explain my reasoning, they say things such as, “But surely you don’t think I should do nothing about all the terrible things going on.”

Actually, yes, that’s exactly what I think. Unless you are one of a very limited number of people whose actions can really change something related to a particular evil, I think you should do nothing — because there’s nothing you can do.

What can you do about periodic random shootings? Nothing.

What can you do about ISIS beheading people and releasing video for the world to watch? Nothing.

What can you do to stop the fighting in the Middle East between Israelis and Palestinians? Nothing.

What can you do to prevent Iranian religious leaders from hating Americans? Nothing.

What can you do to stop tribal and ethnic violence in Africa? Nothing.

The list goes on and on and on. For almost every single person who could possibly read this, there is nothing you can do to stop the evils you see reported on television and read about in newspapers.

Absolutely nothing.

If you’re one of those few people who can change something, do it. If you’re trafficking children for prostitution, well, stop it. If you know something that can stop such abuse, go ahead and do something with your knowledge. If you happen to be in a unique position and your action can stop some particular evil, go ahead. Do it.

Otherwise, accept the difference between what you can do and what you can’t do.

You can’t stop other people from being evil. You can only control your own actions. So what you can do is change your own mind and your own heart. You can change the way you personally treat people. As Jesus memorably said a couple thousand years ago, “You hypocrite, first take the log out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to take the speck out of your brother’s eye.” (Matthew 7:5 ESV)

I have to look away from some things, because I can’t concentrate on everything in the world. If I pay attention to all the things I can’t fix, it will break my heart. It will overwhelm me. It will depress me. And it will make me insane because of my inability to change what I see.

I can change myself. I can’t change others.

That’s why I don’t watch the news. That’s why I don’t read the news. That’s why I won’t be offering wise commentary on the shootings in Chattanooga and telling everybody how to solve the problems.

Life is more peaceful for me now that I’m not trying to fix everybody else. Improving myself is a full-time job.

Share on Social Networks

If you have problems with high blood pressure, I’d like to encourage you to consider making serious changes to your diet. There might be some people who don’t have any choice but to start taking prescription medications for high blood pressure, but I’d like to tell you that I have completely eliminated my issue by eliminating all sugar and almost all carbohydrates. (A couple of months ago, my blood pressure hit 185/144, which was dangerously high — considered stage 3 hypertension.) By completely changing my eating habits, I’m down 22 pounds and my blood pressure is now in the “ideal” range — without taking any medication. In addition, I sleep better and I have more energy. Getting away from the sugar-laden mess that we generally refer to as “highly processed food” has been a life-changer for me. Now my challenge is to avoid slipping back into old habits — by eating in the dangerous ways that almost everyone in our society has come to see as normal.

When I first heard about this, I thought it must be satire. When I discovered it was real, I was appalled, but I still thought it must be a one-time thing from some nutty activist. But it turns out it’s the latest bit of pandering to a bunch of far-left activists who believe that a man can become a woman if he decides to claim he’s a woman. As everybody knows, men have prostate glands. Women do not. Period. End of story. Men can get prostate cancer. Women cannot. But political activists are so eager to pretend that a man claiming to be a “trans woman” is really a woman that they are insisting that “women” be included in public health messages about the issue. This is nothing but political virtue-signaling. If you’re a man, you know which parts you have. You know that you ought to be screened. Nobody is made any safer by dragging far-left gender ideology into simple medical reality.

Every time someone tries to tighten requirements around the use of absentee ballots, I hear screams from Democrats and others on the political left that such efforts are nothing but “suppression of black voters.” These protests have never made sense to me, especially because it’s never been a secret that absentee ballot fraud goes on all the time in certain areas. (Everybody knew it when I worked in politics.) The people who engage in such fraud are rarely caught — often because the local political establishment approves of the crime — but a Democrat who won a primary election in Clay County, Alabama, last year has pleaded guilty to this sort of cheating. Terry Andrew Heflin was running for a place on the Clay County Commission. He was caught ordering seven absentee ballots in the names of various voters and sending them to his post office box — after which he used the ballots to vote absentee for himself seven time. Did he have other people cast additional fraudulent ballots? We’ll never know. But in a primary in which he was able to win with only 141 votes, it wouldn’t take many fraudulent votes to change the election. The next time you hear “civil rights activists” claim that it’s just “voter suppression” to hurt blacks which is at the root of efforts to stop this fraud, remember Terry Heflin. If you care about fair and honest elections, ballot security and voter identity should matter to you.

A state legislator in Maine has been stripped of the ability to speak in the state Legislature — and her votes are not being counted on legislative issues — all because she made a truthful social media post. Rep. Laurel Libby (R-Auburn, Maine) opposes allowing boys to compete against girls’ teams in school athletics and she’s become known for making an issue of it. On Feb. 17, she posted on Facebook about a recent example that she found outrageous. She posted side-by-side photos of a boy named John who competed last year in a state track event and won fifth place against other boys two years ago — and a photo of the same boy (now called Katie) who won first place in the same event this year against girls. Whether you find this outrageous or not, Libby is clearly being honest and truthful about the objective facts of an issue of public importance. But the state Legislature censured her. Democrats decreed that she could not speak in the House and that her votes would not count on legislation — until she apologized for the outrage of telling the truth. She refused and her constituents have been unrepresented in the state House since then. The people who promote this ideology are out of touch with reality and won’t rest until they force the rest of us to join them in this delusion. But even if you agree with “trans” ideology, you should be appalled at this heavy-handed attack on political speech.

The late Steve Jobs was at the center of our culture’s transition from analog to digital. He co-founded Apple Computer. He led the team that revolutionized personal computing with the first Macintosh. As CEO of Apple, he led the development of the iPhone and later the iPad. You would think the children of such a man would be surrounded by technology. But Jobs and his wife Laureen didn’t let their children use iPads. Their home had few screens of any kind. Even though Jobs spent most of his time developing and selling Macs and iPhones and iPads, he was home with his wife and children for dinner when he was in town. The family ate together at a simple wooden table in their kitchen — and there were no digital devices or focus on popular culture. Instead, he’s said to have guided his family toward deep discussions of art, philosophy and education — with no iPads to be found. If the man who guided the development of such products chose a different path for his own children, does that suggest that his digital experience taught him that children need human connection, not screens? And does it suggest the possibility that we might be better off if we made the same choice for our families?

Related Posts